Sustainable Gardening: Tips for Eco-Friendly Spaces

The budget meeting every publisher dreads
If your margins are shrinking, the two cuts that come up first are usually the most visible ones: drop a print day, or drop a section. Before you do either, look at production. At most community papers, people cost far more than paper, and a real share of that payroll goes to page and ad production that readers never see. That work can move to an outside team without changing what lands on the doorstep.
The pressure is real. Northwestern's Medill Local News Initiative counted more than 180 former dailies that now print fewer than three days a week, and found that only about a third of U.S. dailies still print seven days. In November 2025, Lee Enterprises ended Monday print editions at every paper it still printed daily, including the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and the Buffalo News.
Those cuts save money. They also remove the product people pay for. Outsourcing production attacks a cost readers never see, which is why it deserves a place on the list before the scissors come out.
The short answer: cutting a day or a section shrinks your revenue base along with your costs. Outsourcing pagination, ad building and page design shrinks costs while keeping every page, every edition and every ad slot you sell.
What cutting a print day or a section really costs
A print-day cut saves on newsprint, press time and delivery, but it also deletes a product readers and advertisers pay for. The savings show up on the expense line; the losses show up later, on the revenue line.
Subscribers leave. Media consultant John Newby, quoted in the Lenfest Institute's Beyond Print Toolkit, puts the subscriber hit from a frequency cut anywhere from 2–3% to more than 15%, depending on the market. When the Denton Record-Chronicle went to two print days a week in 2020, it lost 10–12% of its print subscribers and later won back just over half of them. The American Press Institute describes phone lines flooded with calls from elderly readers after the Greeley Tribune cut days.
Ad inventory shrinks. Every edition you stop printing is a set of ad positions you can no longer sell. Advertisers who bought a Monday or Saturday slot either consolidate into fewer days at negotiated rates or move their budget elsewhere. Cutting a section works the same way: the sports, real estate or business pages carry their own sponsors, and those sponsors rarely follow the content online at print rates.
Cuts tend to compound. Once a paper has trained readers to expect less, the next cut is easier to justify. Northwestern's report notes the Craig Press in Colorado, which dropped from four print days to two, then went weekly seven years later. Lee Enterprises moved most of its dailies to three days a week in 2023, then ended Monday print at its remaining seven-day papers in 2025.
Habit is hard to rebuild. A reader who stops getting the Tuesday paper does not automatically open the Tuesday e-edition. Some will, but the publishers who managed the transition best, per Lenfest, were the ones who had already moved readers to digital accounts before the cut.
None of this means a print-day cut is always wrong. It means the real saving is the cost reduction minus the revenue you lose, and that net figure is often smaller than the first spreadsheet suggests.
Where the money really goes: people, not paper
At a typical community paper, payroll dwarfs printing. The Lincoln County News in Maine published its own numbers: 83% of its roughly $1 million in 2023 costs were employment-related, while physical materials, including postage, came to about 13%. The publisher estimated that dropping print entirely would cut only about 20% of total costs.
That changes the math on a print-day cut. If eliminating every printed copy saves a fifth of your budget, dropping one day out of five or six saves a fraction of that fifth. The payroll stays.
Part of that payroll is production: paginators, ad builders, classified typesetters and whoever stays late to send pages to the plant. The Bureau of Labor Statistics puts the median desktop publisher wage at $55,290 in May 2025, before benefits and payroll taxes. Two or three production staff can easily represent a six-figure annual commitment that does not shrink in a slow ad week.
This is the cost outsourcing targets. It is large, it is fixed, and readers never see it. A reader notices a missing Monday paper. Nobody notices who placed the ads on page 7.
What outsourced newspaper production looks like
Outsourcing production means your newsroom keeps reporting, editing and selling, while an outside team builds the pages and ads to your specs. Most publishers already accept this logic for printing: the Lenfest Institute notes that closing presses and outsourcing printing is hardly new. Production is the next step down the same road.
A typical setup works like this:
Your editors file stories, photos and the page budget to a shared folder or your CMS.
Your sales team sends ad orders and copy, as they would to an in-house ad builder.
The production team builds ads, paginates pages on your templates, and handles classifieds, photo toning and special sections.
Pages come back as PDFs for your editor to proof, mark up and approve.
Approved pages go to your printer and your e-edition, on your deadline.
Teams working in a different time zone can build overnight, so pages are waiting for proof when your newsroom opens. That can relieve the late-night crunch that burns out small staffs.
The savings math
The quickest test is your in-house cost per page. Divide what production staff cost you each year by the pages you publish.
Worked example (illustrative): a weekly with two production staff at the BLS median of $55,290, plus an assumed 30% for benefits and payroll taxes, spends about $143,750 a year. At 32 pages a week, that is 1,664 pages, or roughly $86 per page before software, hardware and overtime. Any outside quote below that number, covering the same scope, is money saved without cutting a single page.
Run the same sum with your own figures. Include ad building and classifieds in scope, since that is often where in-house hours quietly pile up.
Cut a day, cut a section, or outsource production?
Outsourcing is the only one of the three that lowers cost without shrinking what you sell.
Factor | Cut a print day | Cut a section | Outsource production |
|---|---|---|---|
What you save | Newsprint, press time, delivery for that day | Newsprint and layout time for those pages | Fixed production payroll, overtime, some software seats |
What readers see | A missing edition | Less local content | No change |
Ad inventory | Fewer slots to sell | Section sponsors at risk | Unchanged |
Subscriber risk | 2–3% to 15%+ churn, per industry estimates | Lower, but cancellations from section loyalists | Minimal if quality holds |
Reversible? | Hard; readers rebuild habits elsewhere | Possible, but sponsors may not return | Yes; bring work back in-house or switch vendors |
Time to see savings | Next billing cycle | Next billing cycle | After an onboarding and pilot period |
The honest objections
Skeptical publishers raise fair points. Here is how they hold up.
"Nobody outside knows our paper." True on day one. That is what style guides, templates and a pilot period fix. A good partner learns your fonts, folios, jump rules and ad standards, then follows them every edition.
"We'll lose control of quality." Your editors still proof and approve every page. What changes is who places the elements, not who decides what runs.
"Deadlines are too tight." Late-breaking pages can stay in-house while the predictable work moves out: ad building, classifieds, inside pages, special sections. Many publishers start there.
"It means letting people go." Sometimes it does, and that deserves a straight answer. Often it means not replacing a retiring paginator, or moving an in-house designer to digital, marketing or revenue work that is harder to outsource.
When outsourcing is not the answer
If your print edition loses money even with production costs near zero, outsourcing will not save it. If your production is already handled by a single part-time person at low cost, the savings may be too small to justify the change. And if your print readers have already moved to digital, a frequency cut may be the right call. Run the numbers first.
How to test it before you cut anything: a 30-day pilot
You do not need to bet the paper on a vendor. Run a small, measurable pilot first.
Week 1 — Pick the scope. Choose work that is predictable and low-risk: display ads, classifieds, or one inside section.
Week 1 — Share your standards. Send templates, a style guide, fonts, sample pages and ad specs.
Week 2 — Run in parallel. Have the partner build the same pages your staff builds. Compare accuracy, turnaround and the number of corrections.
Weeks 3–4 — Go live on the pilot scope. Your team proofs and approves; track errors and on-time delivery for each edition.
Day 30 — Decide with numbers. Compare cost per page, correction rate and staff hours freed against your in-house baseline.
If the pilot works, expand the scope. If it does not, you have spent a month and kept every edition, every section and every reader.
FAQ
Is it cheaper to outsource newspaper production than to cut a print day? Often, yes, once lost subscriptions and ad revenue are counted. A print-day cut saves newsprint and delivery but can cost 2–3% to more than 15% of subscribers. Outsourcing reduces fixed payroll while keeping every edition on sale.
What newspaper production work can be outsourced? Editorial pagination, ad building and layout, classified typesetting, special sections and pullouts, photo editing and color correction, tear sheet archiving, and email newsletter production.
Will readers notice that production is outsourced? No, if the partner works from your templates and style guide. Your editors still proof and approve every page before it goes to press.
How long does it take to switch? A practical start is a 30-day pilot on a limited scope, such as display ads or one section, then expand once accuracy and turnaround meet their standard.
Does outsourcing production mean layoffs? Not always. Many papers use it to avoid replacing a departing staff member, to cover overtime, or to move in-house designers to digital and revenue work.
Cut cost, not the paper
Cutting a print day or a section is sometimes the right call. It should not be the first one. Those cuts remove what readers and advertisers pay for, and the industry's own experience shows the losses can eat into the savings.
Production is different. It is one of the largest controllable costs at a community paper, and moving it to a dedicated team leaves every page, every edition and every ad slot in place.
Pagination Co. builds pages and ads for U.S. community newspapers, working from your templates and on your deadlines. Send us one week of pages and we will show you what the same work would cost outsourced. Request a free sample edition →
Sources and publishing notes
Remove this section before publishing; keep the in-text links.
Sources opened
The State of Local News 2024, Medill Local News Initiative — frequency cuts, Craig Press
4 Virginia newspapers cut back on print editions, Cardinal News, Oct. 2025 — Lee Monday cuts
Beyond Print Toolkit: Print frequency and delivery, Lenfest Institute — churn range, Denton, outsourced printing
Expecting pushback before and after reducing print days, American Press Institute — Greeley Tribune
Roadmap to the Future, Part 2: Expenses, The Lincoln County News — 83% / 13% / 20% figures
Desktop Publishers, BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook — $55,290 median, May 2025



